[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Debian-NYC] Fwd: Tuesday Feb 15th 6:30PM PuppetNYC meeting - Come share your experience using puppet

As promised, the announcement regarding puppet meeting next week. Feel
free to ping me if you have any questions.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Brian Gupta <brian.gupta@brandorr.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:14 PM
Subject: Tuesday Feb 15th 6:30PM PuppetNYC meeting - Come share your
experience using puppet
To: puppet-nyc@googlegroups.com

Are you an active user of puppet[1] living in NY/NJ/CT and looking
forward to share your experiences? (Or want to be?)

Please join us next Tuesday, February 15th at Gilt Groupe in Midtown
Manhattan for PuppetNYC's first 2011 meeting.  RSVP required:

This will be an informal and interactive discussion, where attendees
are invited to talk to the group about how they are using puppet (for
instance: what kind of resources are being managed, challenges that
you have seen while deploying puppet, tricks/tips, rants). We're
envisioning 5-20 minutes per person, but nothing is set in stone.

As we haven't met in a while, and because people's interests change
over time, we'd also like hear what people envision for this group.

If you are interested in giving a presentation on an intermediate to
advanced topic for this or future meetings, please stop by our mailing
list and let us know: http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-nyc

After the meeting (8:30 PM or so), we plan to adjourn to Rattle-N-Hum
(14 East 33rd Street) for some relaxing, socializing and bonding.

As mentioned earlier we do have have an existing mailing list, where
we discuss planning meetings and puppet. Please do subscribe, as it is
relatively low traffic: http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-nyc


Gilt Groupe - 2 Park Ave, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10016 (32nd street &
Park Avenue) http://goo.gl/maps/uCgR

Rattle-N-Hum - 14 East 33rd Street (32nd btwn Madison and 5th)

[1] http://www.puppetlabs.com
DebianNYC mailing list

Reply to: