On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 05:14:55PM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote: > In fact, caff will make the key signing even better. Its better to use > it because it will sign the key and then send an email to the user-id on > the key, encrypted to that user, with the signature. Then if that person > is able to receive and decrypt that email, they can take that signature > and upload it to a keyserver themselves. Some people do not like it if > you upload your signature on their key to a keyserver. I also agree that people really should use caff. The process that caff goes through is the best that I can imagine for distributing signatures, and it handles it in a simple way. Distributing signatures should always be done in the way that caff does it, and not using caff for the same full procedure is a pain in the ass, so just use caff. I'm very bummed I can't make it to the meet up. I hope everyone has a great time and that lots of good signatures are exchanged. Hopefully people will be willing to do some more signings at the next meet up that I'm around. jamie.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DebianNYC mailing list DebianNYC@vireo.org http://lists.vireo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debiannyc