Hello, On Sun 07 May 2023 at 12:03PM +01, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Sure, this is in the context of the ongoing discussion in the TC about > revising their side of the advice. I think it's highly unlikely that we revise it rather than just reissue it, at the present time, because too many details are unsettled. > Also, we shouldn't lose sight of the reason why this was issued in the > first place: it is designed to stop a problem from happening, and that > problem can only happen when both conditions are true. I can't read > minds obviously, but I imagine that's the reason the RT advice was > worded as it was. It's designed to stop as-yet-unknown problems happening, too. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature