[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bad interaction between pbuilder/debhelper/dpkg-buildinfo/dpkg-genchanges and dak on security-master

On 07/03/2017 07:06 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> [ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
>> recipients for some reason. ]
> really…  that's just a ftp-master issue IMHO, definitely not due to
> debhelper much less by pbuilder…

Pruning accordingly (I'm not sure why the mails were sent there in the
first place).

>> Is the buildinfo actually published today? I don't see it in the pool. As I
>> would've had some use for them at work I was sort of curious if they could
>> be ingested automatically.
> That's kind of OT, but:
> Not yet.  We people from the reproducible team couldn't find a way to
> usefully talk to ftp-masters people, whom never replied to any of the
> questions in the thread at #763822 (they only did some quick comments on
> IRC, and we have been left on guessing what they would like…).
> Anyhow, .buildinfo files are stored in ftp-master, just not exported to
> the mirrors, you can find them in
> coccia.debian.org:/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/<something>.

So I suppose we talk about 13 GB[1] of static content in about 1.7M
files. Is that something that could be distributed through
static.debian.org if there are concerns around inodes for the main
mirrors? Given that they would be accessed mostly rarely[2]?

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

[1] 7.7kB (75%ile as mentioned in the referenced bug) * 55000 binary
packages * 10 architectures * 3 versions - so quite conservatively
[2] So supposedly a CDN wouldn't bring a lot of benefit as individual
files aren't likely to be hit frequently.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: