On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:53:19PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > (I'd currently tend to accept it, however I'm not yet sure of all the > > consequences of this change.) > This change in itself should not have any consequence as it should not > affect the normal build if the value is not being used, or maybe you > are referring to *when* the value is being used? I don't want to special-case a single suite in buildd/sbuild to not put binary-only=something in there. And yes, those are only warnings, I know, but it would be annoying to have the build logs polluted with them. (And it's one reason why we always expect stable to support the features we use in the archive.) Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature