Re: Declarative Diversions - GSoC Project Update 1
]] Goswin von Brederlow
| Do we even need a "Divert-To"? In most cases the new name doesn't matter
| or it is enough to know that the new name will be old name +.dpkg-divert
| or +.<package> choosen automatically.
I can imagine cases where you want to control what it's renamed to, yes.
For instance, systemd diverts /lib/lsb/init-functions in order to wrap
it. It calls through to the original one, so knowing the name of the
original copy is important.
| With RFC2822 style it would be possible to make the Divert-To optional
| without being confusing to read or parse.
Sure, I'd be fine with it being optional if you really don't care.
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are