Anthony Towns writes ("Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also, triggers)"):
> Beyond that, any additional uploads of dpkg will be REJECTed until you
> guys resolve this nonsense. Flamewars on -devel, ignoring functional
> patches for months on end, package hijacks and requests for UNACCEPTs
> aren't the way to maintain dpkg.
Do we have any basis for negotiation ? Is there anything that you
guys are willing to concede ?
Ian.