Anthony Towns writes ("Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also, triggers)"): > Beyond that, any additional uploads of dpkg will be REJECTed until you > guys resolve this nonsense. Flamewars on -devel, ignoring functional > patches for months on end, package hijacks and requests for UNACCEPTs > aren't the way to maintain dpkg. Do we have any basis for negotiation ? Is there anything that you guys are willing to concede ? Ian.