On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:22:55 +0100 Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> wrote: > > The only problem I have with that is that it would pollute debian-dpkg > > with bug reports, which are already on the BTS (and currently not > > archived in debian-dpkg-bugs). I don't have any problem in getting rid > > of debian-dpkg-bugs, though. > > Is anyone reading debian-dpkg@l.d.o here that would be bothered if they received > the BTS mails related to dpkg ? I'd support having BTS email on this list. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgp_kdLNNakaX.pgp
Description: PGP signature