Do you mind receiving BTS mails of dpkg
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 08:59:55 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > > I'm not entirely convinced that keeping that address alive is useful,
> > > > indeed. We'd better point people to firstname.lastname@example.org
> > >
> > > I would support that. This additional e-mail address only serves to
> > > duplicate mails and hide them from other interested persons.
> > >
> > > I would vote for making it an alias to the list and change the
> > > maintainer address to the list.
> > Ack and get rid of email@example.com (which I never used anyway since
> > I subscribe directly via the PTS).
> The only problem I have with that is that it would pollute debian-dpkg
> with bug reports, which are already on the BTS (and currently not
> archived in debian-dpkg-bugs). I don't have any problem in getting rid
> of debian-dpkg-bugs, though.
Is anyone reading firstname.lastname@example.org here that would be bothered if they received
the BTS mails related to dpkg ?
(I wouldn't, I would just unsubscribe from the PTS)
Alternatively, we could ask the listmasters to drop the BTS mails for the
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :