Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 16:42:38 -0400, Joey Hess <email@example.com> said:
> FWIW, I listed my goals and reasons for working on this in the blog
> post linked to in the head of this thread.
> I feel that I should bow out of this thread here. I've presented an
> idea, a working implementation, and addressed the issues with it to
> the best of my ability. Far too many times in this project I've seen a
> good idea be indefinitely delayed or killed when everyone piles on and
> nitpicks it to death. This idea is in danger of that happening.
I do apologize if my quest for understanding your proposal
sounded like nitpicking; that ws not my intent. I truly did not
understand what I needed to do while using arch (and it turns out no
changes are really required in dpkg for arch).
Suicide is the sincerest form of self-criticism. Donald Kaul
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C