[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Really?



On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 05:10 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:

> Scott James Remnant wrote:
> >I've already done this; all the open bugs are known bugs.
> Really?  This seems extremely unlikely given the state of the bug reports.
> Consider 52087.
> 
> Well then, a lot of tag changes are necessary.
> 
> 96813: tagged unreproducible
> 198699: tagged unreproducible
> 172752: tagged unreproducible
> 192273: tagged unreproducible moreinfo
> 23871: tagged "moreinfo" since 2002 due to unreproducibility
> 20471: tagged "patch"
> 134301: tagged "moreinfo" since 2002 because unreproducible, reported against 
> woody
> 
> Just for starters.
> 
> I assume you want me to remove the "moreinfo", "unreproducible", and "patch"
> tags from those bugs which have had them more than a year?  (Because clearly
> the patch isn't considered acceptable, the more info clearly isn't going to 
> arrive, and the bug isn't unreproducible if it's a known bug).
> 
No, if I'd wanted those removed I would have done it myself.  I don't
consider old bugs to be worthy of discard, and frankly, it's my bug
list.

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: