On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 01:35 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Is it OK if I go through the antique bugs in dpkg (older than oh, say, 2002) > and close the ones which are > (a) unreproducible > or > (b) appear to clearly apply only to versions from before 'woody' (<<1.9.21) > > This would render the bug list significantly more meaningful. > I've already done this; all the open bugs are known bugs. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part