On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 01:16 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 19:48 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > > > * Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com> [2004-08-29 18:49]: > > > > - Non-Linux architectures prefix with the kernel name > > > > (hurd-i386, darwin-powerpc) > > > > > > Or maybe we introduce a new field called Kernel or so. > > > > > Indeed, long term some other and better way of separating kernel and > > architecture is where I lean. > > That sounds like bug #118910. Ok I'll start working on this. > Yup, it's one of yours. I'd be certainly interested in discussing the ideas for this and how it'll operate; will we encode the kernel name in the filenames or not? Probably worth involving ftpmasters at some point to see how they would like to split things up. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part