[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#263743: dpkg: Please use the package architecture name 'ppc64' as specified by the LSB 2.0

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 21:11 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:

> The LSB 2.0 uses 'ppc64' as the name of the architecture. The LSB 2.0 says:
> "Package Architecture Considerations
>  All packages must specify an architecture of ppc64. [...]"
Please file this request with the powerpc64 port team, rather than with
the dpkg maintainer.

Support for this architecture will not be included until the port team
have picked a name for it.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: