On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 21:41 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > I can't see this suggestion being implemented. It isn't dpkg's > role to implement the sorts of policies that are discussed here. > Can this be closed? > *shrug* I've always liked the idea of a Replacement-For style header ... it's cute metadata for the frontends. It shouldn't be closed, it might be worth reassigning to policy with some better ideas. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part