On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 18:22 +0200, Per Olofsson wrote: > On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 22:48 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > Something as critical as dependency resolution needs a little more > > testing before applying; it's been considered for some time now, and > > personally I've been running with it for ages and it's working for me. > > > > It can wait until after release, that way the break period is a little > > bit longer and less critical. > > Okay, I understand. But please note that this bug really made dpkg > painfully slow on the old computer (P2 233) I installed Gnome on. But > if it works on modern hardware I suppose it isn't too critical. > > By the way, do you know what change it was that caused this bug? > I don't think any change has caused it, other than increasingly complicated dependency loops. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part