Bug#188667: marked as done (sid: dselect removed gnome without notice)
Your message dated Thu, 06 May 2004 21:10:30 +0100
with message-id <1083874230.2803.10.camel@localhost>
and subject line Bug#188667: sid: dselect removed gnome without notice
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2003 07:26:06 +0000
>From Gaetan.Angely@skynet.be Sat Apr 12 02:26:05 2003
Received: from sojef.skynet.be [22.214.171.124]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 194FOm-00040F-00; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 02:26:04 -0500
Received: from skynet.be (92.193-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [126.96.36.199])
by sojef.skynet.be (8.12.9/8.12.9/Skynet-OUT-2.21) with ESMTP id h3C7PxcG004870
for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:26:02 +0200
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:25:59 +0200
From: Gaetan Angely <Gaetan.Angely@skynet.be>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030327 Debian/1.3-4
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
Subject: sid: dselect removed gnome without notice
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0
While upgrading with the overnight up2dates, dselect did remove gnome,
The problem from dselect, she did not warn me in the 'Select' phase, as
it should, giving me the opportunity to adjust the selection.
(I only got the message in the 'Install' phase).
It is the first time I am aware of such a fact, but it could have happen
I did try to find wich package induced the withdrawn (maybe galeon), but
could not find the offender.
Received: (at 188667-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2004 20:10:33 +0000
>From email@example.com Thu May 06 13:10:33 2004
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [188.8.131.52] (qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BLpCS-0002ln-00; Thu, 06 May 2004 13:10:33 -0700
Received: (qmail 4407 invoked from network); 6 May 2004 20:10:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO syndicate.netsplit.com) (firstname.lastname@example.org)
by populous.netsplit.com with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 6 May 2004 20:10:30 -0000
Subject: Re: Bug#188667: sid: dselect removed gnome without notice
From: Scott James Remnant <email@example.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-LActJzKim/Lnp9UurN0z"
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5.7
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 21:10:30 +0100
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 15:54 +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 09:25:59AM +0200, Gaetan Angely wrote:
> > Package: dselect
> > Version: 1.10.9
> > While upgrading with the overnight up2dates, dselect did remove gnome,=20
> > gnome-core ...
> > The problem from dselect, she did not warn me in the 'Select' phase, as=
> > it should, giving me the opportunity to adjust the selection.
> > (I only got the message in the 'Install' phase).
> > It is the first time I am aware of such a fact, but it could have happe=
> > former unnoticed.
> > I did try to find wich package induced the withdrawn (maybe galeon), bu=
> > could not find the offender.
> This should be fixed as of dselect 1.10.17:
> * Make dselect do conflict resolution when dealing with automatically
> selected recommended package. Thanks to Colin Watson for the analysis
> and patch. Closes: Bug#151663
> Please test.
No reply, and looks likely to have been fixed.
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----