Processed: Tagging solved bugs

To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
Cc: Dpkg Development <debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org>(dpkg #190611 #222760), Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>(inetutils-ping #223706), Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <geiger@debian.org>(gem #220399)
Subject: Processed: Tagging solved bugs
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:33:18 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.107224001630490.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <3FE90E6E.5090508@twcny.rr.com>
References: <3FE90E6E.5090508@twcny.rr.com>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 190611 +patch
Bug#190611: dpkg: conflicts for dpkg-dev isn't the correct version
There were no tags set.
Bug#222760: dpkg-dev: Bogus warning about md5sum error
Tags added: patch

> tags 222760 +patch
Bug#222760: dpkg-dev: Bogus warning about md5sum error
Tags were: patch
Bug#190611: dpkg: conflicts for dpkg-dev isn't the correct version
Tags added: patch

> tags 220399 +patch
Bug#220399: gem ddoesn't build on powerpc and hppa
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> tags 223706 +patch
Bug#223706: inetutils-ping: FTBFS: configure.ac incompatible with autoconf >= 2.58
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#224929: dpkg -i foo, fails: I/O error?
Next by Date: look
Previous by thread: Bug#224929: dpkg -i foo, fails: I/O error?
Next by thread: look
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread