Re: conffiles may be removed, this is not a dpkg bug [was Re: Processed: reassigning]

To: Erich Schubert <erich@debian.org>
Cc: galeon-common@packages.debian.org, dpkg@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: conffiles may be removed, this is not a dpkg bug [was Re: Processed: reassigning]
From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 16:15:22 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020707141522.GA26843@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020707133505.GB11851@bombadil.xmldesign.de>
References: <20020707094129.GC1911@bombadil.xmldesign.de> <[🔎] handler.s.C.1026034892775.transcript@bugs.debian.org> <20020707114143.GC23302@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <[🔎] 20020707133505.GB11851@bombadil.xmldesign.de>

On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 03:35:05PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > Someone or something removed a file marked as conffile. Removed is a valid
> 
> This "someone" was dpkg.

Try, like, proving it? I don't recall seeing anything more than speculation
in the bug report.

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: conffiles may be removed, this is not a dpkg bug [was Re: Processed: reassigning]
  - From: Erich Schubert <erich@debian.org>

References:
- Processed: reassigning
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
- Re: conffiles may be removed, this is not a dpkg bug [was Re: Processed: reassigning]
  - From: Erich Schubert <erich@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: conffiles may be removed, this is not a dpkg bug [was Re: Processed: reassigning]
Next by Date: Re: conffiles may be removed, this is not a dpkg bug [was Re: Processed: reassigning]
Previous by thread: Re: conffiles may be removed, this is not a dpkg bug [was Re: Processed: reassigning]
Next by thread: Re: conffiles may be removed, this is not a dpkg bug [was Re: Processed: reassigning]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread