Re: Bug#134952: marked as done (dpkg: md5sum for dpkg package) (fwd)

[Jor-el <jorel@trillian.megadodo.umb>]

Hi,

	Well, duh! I see that this question was answered a couple of posts
down.

With apologies,
Jor-el

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:14:36 -0600 (CST)
From: Jor-el <jorel@trillian.megadodo.umb>
Reply-To: jorel@austin.rr.com
To: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#134952: marked as done (dpkg: md5sum for dpkg package)

On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

> 
> Hi!
> 
> Shouldn't a so important package like dpkg have a md5sum?
> 
> $debsums dpkg
> debsums: no md5sums for dpkg
> 
> Best Regards,
> -G. Jasny
> 

<More stuff snipped>

> From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
> To: Gregor Jasny <gjasny@wh8.tu-dresden.de>, 134952-done@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#134952: dpkg: md5sum for dpkg package
> Message-ID: <20020221014405.GE20064@wiggy.net>
> References: <[🔎] 200202202259.g1KMxSL4011325@backfire.WH8.TU-Dresden.De>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200202202259.g1KMxSL4011325@backfire.WH8.TU-Dresden.De>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
> Delivered-To: 134952-done@bugs.debian.org
> 
> Previously Gregor Jasny wrote:
> > Shouldn't a so important package like dpkg have a md5sum?
> 
> No.
> 
> Wichert.
Hi,

	I dont understand. Why not?

Thanks,
Jor-el