Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info.
- To: Chris Wagner <wagnerc@plebeian.com>
- Cc: Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxedgexx.com>, debian-user@lists.debian.org, debian-isp@lists.debian.org, debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info.
- From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 14:55:33 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20000517145533.E508@mors.wiggy.net>
- Mail-followup-to: Chris Wagner <wagnerc@plebeian.com>, Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxedgexx.com>, debian-user@lists.debian.org, debian-isp@lists.debian.org, debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000517024340Z362829-4977+2784@mail2.one.net>; from wagnerc@plebeian.com on Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:43:40PM -0400
- References: <[🔎] 20000517024340Z362829-4977+2784@mail2.one.net>
Previously Chris Wagner wrote:
> RPM is a piece of crap compared to dpkg, and now we have apt (advanced
> package tool).
Can we please not be so negative about rpm? I'll agree that dpkg is
better (and of course I'm completely not biased here :), but rpm
is not a piece of crap.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgp4TN1xogWW6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: