Previously Tom Rothamel wrote: > [1] I'm considering using debconf, but I'm not quite sure how well > that would deal with questions that change on every invocation. It > currently uses it's own method for user interaction, with a console > and soon a curses version. I don't mind improving dpkg, but if we're going to add some new frontend it should use debconf. We're slowly starting to move to using debconf for all user interaction and having dpkg itself use something else would be silly. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpX63RoY8qCc.pgp
Description: PGP signature