Re: dpkg_1.10.11_i386.changes ACCEPTED
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 02:03:46PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Martin Quinson wrote:
>
> > Err, there was a lot of dorming translation bugs which would have been
> > really easy to fix. I did my best to sort them out and ask the patches I was
> > unable to produce myself.
>
> I didn't forget about them. .11 was released, so that I wouldn't be sitting
> on it anymore. The big change with .11, was the removal of the BYHAND files.
> This allows uploads of dpkg to be processed without delay.
Cool, I was a bit worried, but as usual you had a very good reason ;)
> > I speak about #149142, #157819, #162154 at the very least (which fix errors
> > in the provided translations, with patch provided). #164906, #207758 and
> > #171489 are also very simple (they add more translations). And I received
> > yesterday a de.po which would solve #109669, #115352 and #187952. I'll send
> > it to the BTS right now.
> >
> > Are you willing to do a 1.10.12 in the next week, or are those bugs doomed
> > to dormance?
>
> I've already done a .12 and .13. I'm just waiting for things to settle down a
> bit before I start doing anything more.
Can I do anything to help you, beside contacting l10n mailing lists to
provide patches, mark the one I feel ok for commit [TRIVIAL] and shuting up
on this ML to let you work ?
Thanks for your time, Mt.
--
I'm sick of being the guy who eats insects and gets the funny syphilis.
Reply to: