Re: Why pipeline fail

[victory <victory.deb@gmail.com>]

On 2022/08/25 9:52, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 19:03 +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> > It seems unlikely that this text has changed, so maybe it's a
> > regression in codespell - maybe it has somehow lost the ability to
> > recognise <programlisting> and <literal> strings as code that it
> > shouldn't be spellchecking?  I see there's a new version in sid...
> I don't think codespell knows anything about formats other than plain
> text, so I think the issue would be in layers above codespell.

just FYI:
the line was added just after the previous 2.1 release,
and 2.1 doesn't have it
you can say it's regression now
but you can consider adding an entry to (maybe) dictionary_code.txt

commit info (addresses removed):
---
Author: luzpaz   2021-06-12 23:56:56
Committer: GitHub   2021-06-12 23:56:56
Parent: aaeb072f2d97f2c8ae179ae2534fb37cd98bc5a9 (Add variations for 
associate, distribute, nonsense, prefix, profile, without (#1912))
Child:  f5abc6905a159e09442cd202c1cc4cd7303bce2e (Added typos variations 
for 'dissymmetry' (#1826))
Branches: master, remotes/origin/master, 
remotes/origin/peternewman-sort-suggestions, 
remotes/origin/revert-2346-master, 
remotes/origin/skip-adn-readme-followup1535
Follows: v2.1.0
Precedes: v2.2.0

    Add several spelling corrections + refinements (#1835)
---

victory