[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: I took liberty to update po for debian-faq



On venerdì 15 marzo 2019, at 18:45 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,

Hi,

> 
> Today I committed a French translation update from 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920492
> 
> However, this translation seems outdated as Beatrice mentions above.
> When I now call "make update-po", all po files (!) are changed again because
> of changings like this:
> 
> 
> @@ -3185,7 +3185,7 @@ msgid ""
>  "management system (dpkg) will send an error message that it also needs "
>  "<package>binutils</package>, and stop installing "
>  "<package>gcc</package>. (However, this facility can be overridden by the "
> -"insistent user, see <manref section=\"8\" name=\"dpkg\">.) See more in <ref "
> +"insistent user, see <manref name=\"dpkg\" section=\"8\">.) See more in <ref "
>  "id=\"depends\"> below."

In the past when I saw that with make update-po all the resulting
changes were like the one you mention, I just reverted the
changes. With my first update-po, at least for Italian, there were
some real "updates" with new messages and changed messages, not only
this kind of changes with just a different order of the items in the
tags.

After all, you only need one "make update-po" after some changes in the
original text. Then you won't need to run it again until the original
text changes. But, yes, it is an annoying problem.

> Means the "section=xxx" and "name=yyy" parts within <manref ... > are swapped,
> leading to 18 fuzzy strings :-((
> 
> I remember such issue from years ago. But is this still an unfixed issue?
> 
> This way we cannot get the translations up-to-date, hrrrr ...
> 
> Is this known? How to deal with this?

See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725931

Anyway as far as I can see, the proposed work around is already implemented
in the Makefile of the faq that already contains "PERL_PERTURB_KEYS=0
PERL_HASH_SEED=0".

> Beatrice: which Debian version are you using? I wonder if the tools in Debian
> unstable behave different from those in Debian stable (I'm trying to explain,
> what happens here).
> I am using Debian stable.

I am using testing.

Ciao,

beatrice


Reply to: