[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#931637: marked as done (Slight inaccuracy in explanation of "apt upgrade")

Your message dated Tue, 9 Jul 2019 21:46:15 +0200
with message-id <42ee74c5-8891-b37f-91a4-4fa8cbdfca54@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#931637: Slight inaccuracy in explanation of "apt upgrade"
has caused the Debian Bug report #931637,
regarding Slight inaccuracy in explanation of "apt upgrade"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
931637: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931637
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: minor
In section 4.4.4, "Minimal system upgrade", the Release notes say that "apt upgrade" "has the effect of upgrading those packages which can be upgraded without requiring any other packages to be removed or installed".
However, when I ran this command (and consistently with my past experience of "apt upgrade"), it didn't just upgrade packages, but also installed new ones. I think this is a change from "apt-get upgrade", which behaved as described here.
To correct this, I think the words "or installed" should be omitted from the end of the sentence. 

--
Ben Harris, University of Cambridge Information Services.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 08-07-2019 17:44, Justin B Rye wrote:
> merge Bug#931637 931559
> thanks
> 
> Ben Harris wrote:
>> In section 4.4.4, "Minimal system upgrade", the Release notes say that "apt
>> upgrade" "has the effect of upgrading those packages which can be upgraded
>> without requiring any other packages to be removed or installed".
>>
>> However, when I ran this command (and consistently with my past experience
>> of "apt upgrade"), it didn't just upgrade packages, but also installed new
>> ones.  I think this is a change from "apt-get upgrade", which behaved as
>> described here.
> 
> Yes, sorry, we'd just noticed this (bug #931559).  Let's see if I can
> work out how to do a merge.
>  
>> To correct this, I think the words "or installed" should be omitted from the
>> end of the sentence.
> 
> That would accurately reflect the fact that the instructions given no
> longer provide a minimal upgrade, but I would prefer to correct them
> so that they do - this is all the result of a search-and-replace of
> "apt-get" to "apt" where the two in fact behave slightly differently.
> 
> I attach a patch that does only that.  It has also been suggested
> that we could add a footnote suggesting that users might
> alternatively use "apt upgrade" but that this also installs new
> packages - what do you think?

Thanks, pushed.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: