On Du, 07 iul 19, 22:58:58, Justin B Rye wrote: > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > Alternatively the command could also be switched back to 'apt-get' in > > order to get the minimal upgrade to be as minimal as possible ;) > > Well, wasn't that was the point of having a "minimal" stage in the > first place? So probably if we're going to keep that section it > should do what it says it does. And until and unless apt develops a > flag to make it behave the old way, that seems to mean we should go > back to prescribing "apt-get upgrade". How about a footnote mentioning that 'apt' could be used as well, but it won't be so 'minimal' anymore? Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature