[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#926723: fcitx may not working with Wayland in buster



Hi Paul,

Your message wasn't in my mailbox. I think you should use
nnn-submitter@bugs.debian.org or just CC me.

On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 08:15:13PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> Hi Shengjing,
> 
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:16:18 +0800 Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> wrote:
> > Follow up my post on -devel. Fcitx, the default input method in
> > task-chinese-s-desktop(for Simplified Chinese user), may not work on
> > Wayland. Since Wayland is the default choice of GNOME, the default
> > desktop, some notes should be added.
> > 
> > However I'm not quite sure about the situation, I Cced Boyuan here.
> > He probably can have more comments. We talked yesterday, but he is
> > busy recently. So I just opened this bug, to make sure we'll not forget
> > before release.
> 
> I added the text copied below to fix bug 923791. Do you think it is
> sufficient to close this bug? Would it help and be enough if I just add
> fcitx to the list?
> 

Yeah, that looks fine.

It could be:

including..., the default Simplified Chinese input method,
<systemitem role="package">fcitx</systemitem>, and ...

Thanks!

> Paul
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/commit/5496e24
> 
> <section id="apps-in-gnome-on-wayland">
> <title>Some applications don't work in GNOME on Wayland</title>
> <para>
>  In contrast to Debian releases before buster, <literal>Wayland</literal> is
>  now the default display manager that is used by
>  <literal>GNOME</literal>. <literal>GNOME</literal> used to default to
>  <literal>Xorg</literal> in the past. Some applications, including the
>  popular package manager <systemitem role="package">synaptic</systemitem>
>  and most screen recording applications, have not been updated to work
>  properly under <literal>Wayland</literal>. In order to use these packages,
>  one needs to login with <literal>GNOME on Xorg</literal>.
> </para>
> </section>


Reply to: