Re: LDP still relevant?
> Indeed. It would probably be more useful for the LDP to be updated
> than to abandon it, if only because it has an easily recognised name.
> If there are better sources, the LDP should adopt them, replacing the
> outdated ones.
Unfortunately I don't think the LDP in its current form has much of a chance of
catching up with anything else. Technical-style guides are simply not the way
most users read information. I'd love to see the effort redirected to
distribution wikis or even upstream to projects!
--
Tom M
Reply to: