Re: Fw: Re: broken links in the apt manual's area
Hi,
Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has been long since I did this ...
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 10:00:27PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > debwww/cron/parts/7doc
> >
> > Ok. That's somewhat heavy for me, I fear.
>
> OK. Anyway, I created the current state.
>
> > Summary:
> >
> > The not-working links pointed to
> >
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-guide/apt-guide.de.txt
> >
> > and
> >
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-offline/apt-offline.de.txt
>
> Excuse me. I am a bit confused and I need you to re-explain things to
> me. Which page are you looking at!
>
> apt-guide is not listed in https://www.debian.org/doc/
>
> I see it in English page as https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals
>
> It only lists HTML pages. (Maybe you can blame me for this.)
Now the txt variants are there again at
https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals.
(I have removed them for the time being, and yesterday re-activated them.)
At the moment the txt variants are all dead links.
>
> The German page does not even list apt-doc files.
>
> Can you tell me where you find such links? When I made these, I
> followed what used to be. (Or I thought I did so.)
>
> > but the files are now under
> >
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-guide/guide.de.txt
> >
> > and
> >
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-offline/offline.de.txt
>
> Yah... not just German but all other languages. I did not want to
> change their file name.
>
> Regards,
>
> Osamu
>
> PS: Your patch on the BTS seems to achieve what you wish. But why do we
> have to change it into what you suggest? Is there any negatives? (I am
> neutral. I am just asking this as question.)
Because we have dead links for txt versions at the moment :-)
Holger
--
============================================================
Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under
D E B I A N L I N U X 8 . 0 " J E S S I E " .
Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
============================================================
Reply to: