Re: Bug#721215: The Debian Administration Handbook and https://www.debian.org/doc
Hi
El 10/06/15 a las 06:45, Joost van Baal-Ilić escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I can't find any "Debian Administrator's Manual" which is DFSG-free and
> packaged in Debian; as mentioned by original bug submitter.
>
> (I _did_ find the "Debian GNU/Linux System Administrator's Manual" (obsolete,
> Copyright © 1997 Ardo van Rangelrooij Copyright © 1998 Oliver Elphick Copyright
> © 1998 Tapio Lehtonen); there's an old copy still at
> http://debian.man.ac.uk/non-debian/LDP/LDP/www.debian.org/doc/manuals/system-administrator
> .)
>
> Indeed, it seems we're talking about "The Debian Administration Handbook". I
> agree with the bug's submitter that that one needs a more prominent place under
> http://www.debian.org/doc . An entry under "Users' manuals", and an entry on
> https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals (which could be renamed from "DDP
> Users' Manuals" to "Users' Manuals") would be appropriate, imho.
Is it important to state whether a piece of documentation belongs to the
Debian Documentation Project or not? I think yes (I'm not part of DDP,
though...), and I think it's better to create a new section than
removing the "DDP" part of the title in "user-manuals" and add the
handbook there.
Any other opinion?
>
> https://www.debian.org/doc/books could refer to the new
> https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#debian-handbook .
I would update the entry of books, to reference the page/section where
we finally add the Handbook.
Thanks
>
> Bye,
>
> Joost
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 01:29:57AM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>> Hi everybody
>>
>> If you refer to "The Debian Administration Handbook" (the first
>> reference listed in the subpage https://www.debian.org/doc/books), I
>> have no clear idea about what to do.
>>
>> On one side, the reference should stay there even if we add an entry in
>> "user manuals", because it's a printed book.
>>
>> On the other side, I'm not sure if "user manuals" is for the
>> documentation maintained by the Debian Documentation Project (and then,
>> the Handbook shouldn't be there, even if there is a package available,
>> several translations, and it's DFSG-free).
>>
>> Finally, I suppose we could change the title of the section "Other,
>> shorter documents" to "Other, and shorter documents" and include a link
>> as first reference in that section, but I think it's not a good solution.
>>
>> CC'ing debian-doc mailing list, I hope they can give advice about how to
>> proceed.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> --
>> Laura Arjona
>> https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
>>
>
>
--
Laura Arjona
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Reply to: