[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#775944: marked as done (Please, document changes between Apache 2.2 and 2.4)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:44:34 +0100
with message-id <54C7F8B2.6060008@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#775944: Please, document changes between Apache 2.2 and 2.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #775944,
regarding Please, document changes between Apache 2.2 and 2.4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

775944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775944
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal

(Apache maintainers X-Debbugs-CC)


Many changes in the way to handle configuration (e.g., configuration
files name must now end with .conf, semantic of access control, etc.)
may deserve to be documented in the Release Notes, or at least a pointer
to the upstream documentation. #721071 might be of interest.




-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (110, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2015-01-25 09:25, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
> I have committed the patch for now (with some missing words added).  Let
> me know if you spot anything that could be improved.
> Thanks,
> ~Niels

I have taken the liberty of closing this bug now.  Should you have any
remarks to the patch / wording, please do not hesitate to let me know
(or file a new bug).


--- End Message ---

Reply to: