Bug#703689: release-notes: evolution paragraph deprecated
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
evolution paragraph in Wheezy release notes is deprecated since it was
about Squeeze upgrade. Attached patch removes it. It might still not be
wise to upgrade with evolution running (and hoping it'll still work just
fine before restarting it), but we already recomment to upgrade from
outside a desktop environment anyway.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Index: en/upgrading.dbk
===================================================================
--- en/upgrading.dbk (revision 9642)
+++ en/upgrading.dbk (working copy)
@@ -1258,30 +1258,7 @@
# visudo -f /etc/sudoers.d/mychanges
</screen>
</section>
-<section id="issues-evolution">
-<title>Evolution</title>
-<para>
-Evolution (the GNOME Desktop mail client) has been updated from version
-<literal>2.22</literal> to <literal>2.30</literal>. This changes the
-storage format used by the package for local data and there is a
-possibility of data loss if the upgrade is performed whilst <systemitem
-role="package">evolution</systemitem> is running. Exiting the
-application itself may not be sufficient, as various related components
-will continue to run in the background. To avoid any potential issues,
-it is recommended that you completely exit your desktop environment
-before beginning the upgrade to &releasename;.
-</para>
-<para>
-As part of the upgrade process, <systemitem
-role="package">evolution</systemitem> will check whether any related
-processes are running and will recommend that they be closed. A
-secondary check for processes will then be performed; if necessary, a
-choice will be offered between allowing the remaining processes to be
-killed or aborting the upgrade in order to resolve the situation by
-hand.
-</para>
</section>
-</section>
<!-- End of 'trouble' section -->
</section>
Reply to: