[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#617466: marked as done (release-notes: Instructions do not restart script after reboot.)



Your message dated Sat, 12 Mar 2011 23:40:02 +0100
with message-id <20110312224001.GA15488@javifsp.no-ip.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#617466: release-notes: Instructions do not restart script after reboot.
has caused the Debian Bug report #617466,
regarding release-notes: Instructions do not restart script after reboot.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
617466: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617466
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal

Hi,

I see no instructions in the squeeze release notes that say to restart
'script' after reboot, so the script only records the "first half" of
the upgrade.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.8
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:23:34PM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> I see no instructions in the squeeze release notes that say to restart
> 'script' after reboot, so the script only records the "first half" of
> the upgrade.

Thank you.  I have added a footnote to the text to indicate this. It is
now in the SVN revision 8554 of the release notes.

Regards

Javier

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: