Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:58:56 +0100 with message-id <20110113215856.GB2813@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#609929: release-notes: mention upstart in chapter about dependency-based booting? has caused the Debian Bug report #609929, regarding release-notes: mention upstart in chapter about dependency-based booting? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 609929: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609929 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: release-notes: mention upstart in chapter about dependency-based booting?
- From: Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:50:37 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110113225037.84022ba0.linux@wansing-online.de>
Package: release-notes Severity: wishlist In file whats-new.dbk, there's a chapter about "dependency-based boot sequencing and parallel boot." As there are two similar approaches on this (upstart and systemd), should upstart be mentioned as the one actually beeing used in Squeeze? ============================================================================== An important improvement in the &debian; boot system is the introduction - of dependency-based boot sequencing and parallel boot. This feature is enabled + of dependency-based boot sequencing and parallel boot. This feature named + upstart is enabled by default in new installs and it will be enabled for upgrades from &oldreleasename;, if possible. ============================================================================== Holger -- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0 under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de>, 609929-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#609929: release-notes: mention upstart in chapter about dependency-based booting?
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:58:56 +0100
- Message-id: <20110113215856.GB2813@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110113225037.84022ba0.linux@wansing-online.de>
- References: <[🔎] 20110113225037.84022ba0.linux@wansing-online.de>
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 22:50:37 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > Package: release-notes > Severity: wishlist > > > In file whats-new.dbk, there's a chapter about > "dependency-based boot sequencing and parallel boot." > > As there are two similar approaches on this (upstart and > systemd), should upstart be mentioned as the one actually beeing used > in Squeeze? > No, this is not what this section is about (it's about insserv and sysvinit). Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---