Re: Bug#521860: lack of upstream response
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 19:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 21:38:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > It's probably worth a mention in the release notes though. If anyone
> > looking at this bug could propose some wording for this, that would be
> > appreciated :)
> Initial attempt below, comments welcome.
> +Certain berkeley db version 7 files created with libdb3 can't be read by newer
s/Certain/Some/ ? I'm not sure if the RN has a policy on contractions
but "cannot" might be clearer for translators.
I suspect we also want "Berkeley Database".
> +libdb versions. (see <ulink url="&url-bts;521860">bug#521860</ulink>).
> +As a workaround, the files can be recreated with <command>db4.8_load</command>.
Worth mentioning db4.8-util here?