On 12-28 02:05, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > Perhaps this should make explicit (between the two paragraphs of 4.2) > > that > > > > It is not suggested to skip major Debian releases when upgrading > > between stable releases. > > > This is a bit redundant and uses weak statement of "suggest". > (The following paragraph uses "assumes" too) Yes, it is somehow redundant, but I think it should be on chapter 4, becuase currently user can easly find this page by websearch, and not read fully introduction. But It should be stronger, yes. > > Why not make following paragraph stronger as: > > Your system must have been updated to the latest stable point release of > lenny. If you have not done this or are unsure, follow the instructions > in Section A.1, “Upgrading your lenny system”. > Maybe combine both: Your system must have been updated to the latest stable point release of lenny. If you have older distribution installed (like etch), or your lenny system is not up to date or you are just unsure, follow the instructions in Section A.1, “Upgrading your lenny system”. Without performing this step upgrade to squeeze will most likely fail and can result in broken system, which will need heavy manual interventions. > My questing is "How backports should we mention backports?" > > > and the chapter be retitled to something like "Upgrades from lenny". > > Other possible improvements? > > Let's think along Chapter 4 "Upgrades from Debian 5.0 (lenny)" I agree. > > Osamu Thanks you all. Witek -- Witold Baryluk JID: witold.baryluk // jabster.pl
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature