Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:58:39 +0200 with message-id <20101022205839.GA25566@javifsp.no-ip.org> and subject line Fixed in lenny Release Notes has caused the Debian Bug report #533265, regarding release-notes: Initial aptitude upgrade unclear to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 533265: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533265 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: release-notes: Initial aptitude upgrade unclear
- From: "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:44:50 -0500
- Message-id: <20090616044450.23511.81948.reportbug@mofo.meme.com>
Package: release-notes Version: lenny Severity: normal Hello, 4.5.4. Upgrade apt and/or aptitude first It is not clear from the text of this section that if you have aptitude installed you should do the: # aptitude install aptitude and not the: # apt-get install apt I've done a few upgrades and done the apt-get install apt rather than the aptitude install aptitude and the result is that aptitude is uninstalled. After installing aptitude then the apt-utils package remains uninstalled and you get warnings from aptitude until after you install it. At least this is my experience. I could be wrong about what I should be doing but I just did another system and this time did (only) the "aptitude install aptitude" and the upgrade worked just fine from that point. So, I believe the text should be much more clear about which command should be run. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 533265-submitter@bugs.debian.org, 533265-close@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>, Nicolas François <nicolas.francois@centraliens.net>
- Subject: Fixed in lenny Release Notes
- From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:58:39 +0200
- Message-id: <20101022205839.GA25566@javifsp.no-ip.org>
- Mail-followup-to: 533265-submitter@bugs.debian.org, 533265-close@bugs.debian.org, "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>, Nicolas François <nicolas.francois@centraliens.net>
Hi, I have taken some time off the editing of Squeeze's Release Notes to fix this pending bug on Lenny's Release Notes. I've mostly used Nicolas' patch with some editing here and there. You can find the full patch available at http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/ddp/manuals/branches/release-notes/lenny/en/upgrading.dbk?r1=7471&r2=7717 Thanks, JavierAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---