[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: releasenotes

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 03:41:50PM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
> >  ----------
> >  A) another perennial, though it seems to use the wrong relative
> >        release names.
> This is because the release names where hardcoded here (instead of
> using XML entities). Will fix.

I've reviewed this and the appendix is correct but misleading. The release
name was not hardcoded, it actually describes what to do if using the old
release (lenny in this case) and it has not been upgraded to the last point
release yet. 

I've adjusted the title heading to prevent confusion, but wording of this
section could be improved.

> >  C) needs to go.
> True, will remove in the next round.




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: