Bug#507118: release-notes: Document use of backports.org packages during upgrade ( proposed text included )
W. Martin Borgert schrieb:
On 2008-11-28 10:39, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
As backports.org is now semi official ( ie links from the packages web
interface ) I propose to document properly how to deal with the
backported packages when doing a etch2lenny upgrade.
This text should go in the userbackports section of the release note
and is a rewording of http://backports.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faq.
Many thanks for your text. It's added now in the SVN, please review.
The text looks good to me, however I noticed a mistake
temporarily to <literal>1001</literal> for all packages from etch
should be replaced with
temporarily to <literal>1001</literal> for all packages from &releasename
I forgot to update this part of the text when rewording the backports FAQ.
Please update it, because the current version of the text gives a
*wrong* advice: if you apt-pin all the packages to the etch version, you
would actually never upgrade to lenny ...