Re: SVN finally fully enabled as source for website manuals
- To: debian-doc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: SVN finally fully enabled as source for website manuals
- From: "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 19:54:06 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20080708175406.GA14033@gardel.xinocat.com>
- In-reply-to: <20080627170941.GA9224@orion.carnet.hr>
- References: <20080616214632.GE11882@mail-vs.djpig.de> <20080624141028.GA16231@orion.carnet.hr> <20080624141434.GA17128@orion.carnet.hr> <20080627061143.GA20661@ouaza.com> <20080627140442.GA3612@gardel.xinocat.com> <20080627170941.GA9224@orion.carnet.hr>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 07:09:41PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> We extract files from documentation packages - in places where it is
> necessary. If you want we (webmaster, debwww) can make it so for developer's
> reference, and then re-link the main indices to that location (leaving the
> SVN-build link separate).
So far, nobody spoke up against it. How can I help to change the
process?
> If you want dblatex upgraded on the www-master machine, please make sure
> that a stable backport exists on backports.org and file an RT ticket at
> rt.debian.org, DSA queue.
To me the first method sounds like the easier and secure one,
esp. in the long run. (E.g. AFAIK, backports.org has no official
security support.)
Cheers!
Reply to: