On Sun,23.Nov.08, 23:51:33, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2008-11-23 18:01, Simon Paillard wrote: > > While copy/paste from sgml to Po and translating release-notes, I've > > noticed entries specific to the sarge->etch migration are still > > documented and present in the file. > > Thanks for pointing this out. There are probably more outdated > sections and paragraphs. Does it mean such entries are fair game? I've been holding of translating some entries because I was waiting for removal. I'll be back with more specific info, but from the top of my head: - devfs -> udev - AFAIK etch doesn't support 2.4 kernels, so all 2.4 -> 2.6 entries - initrd-tools stuff Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature