[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: deprecated entries in release-notes ?

On Sun,23.Nov.08, 23:51:33, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2008-11-23 18:01, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > While copy/paste from sgml to Po and translating release-notes, I've
> > noticed entries specific to the sarge->etch migration are still
> > documented and present in the file.
> Thanks for pointing this out. There are probably more outdated
> sections and paragraphs.

Does it mean such entries are fair game? I've been holding of 
translating some entries because I was waiting for removal.

I'll be back with more specific info, but from the top of my head:

- devfs -> udev
- AFAIK etch doesn't support 2.4 kernels, so all 2.4 -> 2.6 entries
- initrd-tools stuff

If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: