[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#502923: developers-reference: Add new Upstream-* fields for Bts, Upstream-Vcs-Browser, Upstream-Vcs-{Git, Hg, Svn) ...

On 21/10/08 at 14:14 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> No idea. I don't know anyone working on that. In the mean time we have
> Mole (http://wiki.debian.org/Mole) and Ultimate Debian Database
> (http://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase) that appeared and that
> should be taken into account too.
> The CRMI was a proposal discussed at debconf and proposed by myself as
> part of my work in the QA team and related to my experience with the PTS.
> But then I lost interest in coding it but I'm still convinced that we need
> something like that.

I'm not so sure we need something like CRMI. Ideally, sure, it would be
better to have an external (not in packages) way to store data. But the
whole Debian infrastructure is centered around packages, and maybe we
should just strive to make it easier to add information to packages,
rather than manage information elsewhere.
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

Reply to: