Your message dated Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:13:43 +0100 with message-id <20061115141343.GM2560@mails.so.argh.org> and subject line "devfs -> udev" documented has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Etch: Upgrade path from devfs to udev needs documenting
- From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:51:21 +0100
- Message-id: <200511291251.29868.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Package: release-notes There may be issues when moving from devfs to udev. These should probably be documented in the Release Notes for Etch. The reason this needs to be documented is that Etch 2.6 kernels no longer support devfs. See for example http://bugs.debian.org/341152 At the very least a general warning should be added. An alternative could be to suggest switching to static dev before upgrade.Attachment: pgpB3KgtHkoza.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 341225-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: "devfs -> udev" documented
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:13:43 +0100
- Message-id: <20061115141343.GM2560@mails.so.argh.org>
Hi, I added also some documentation about this change - and referenced also bug 341152 there. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--- End Message ---