Re: Standard license blurb for DDP documents?
Quoting Javier Fern�ez-Sanguino Pe�firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> How about we unify in one, maybe two, licenses? I suggest we ask DDP authors
> to either use the GPL with a standard blurb, such as the one used
> by the Installation Manual (see below for a sample)
> Redistribution and use in source (SGML DocBook or Debiandoc) and
Officially, it's "DocBook SGML", and because SGML becomes
obsolete, I would prefer "DocBook XML or Debiandoc".
> 'compiled' forms (SGML, HTML, PDF, PostScript, RTF and so forth) with
I'ld remove SGML here, because it's confusing in this context.
No more comments about the license text - I prefer GPL :-)