[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Could someone force the rebuild of securing-debian-howto on master?

On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:57:59AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:20:16AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > I'm not sure who has access to master, but it seems that it's unable to 
> > regenerate the HTML files for the "Securing Debian Manual". Reviewing the 
> > publish logs [1] it just tries to install the HTML files without
> > regenerating them even though the publised html files hold a date of back 
> > December.
> > 
> > I'm not sure if this is a time-skew problem, or a problem on my side, but I 
> > would appreciate if someone could force the 'securing-debian-howto' 
> > directory to be rebuilt in master. Anyone?
> This seems to be a bug in your Makefile:
> $(MANUAL).%.html.stamp: $(MANUAL).%.sgml  $(MANUAL).%.ent $(wildcard %/*.sgml)
> This doesn't match the English version because the file is called
> $(MANUAL).sgml and not $(MANUAL).en.sgml. All other versions seem to
> be up-to-date (AFAICT from the stamp files).

The english version should actually be $(MANUAL).en.sgml (it's part of
SGMLSRCS since 'en' is part of LANGS). Notice that this should create it:
(and indeed it does it for me):

$(MANUAL).%.sgml: $(MANUAL0).sgml
        sed -e "s/@@LANGS@@/$*/g" \
            -e "s/@@DIRS@@/$*/g" \
            -e "s/@@NAME@@/$(MANUAL)/g" \
                $< > $(MANUAL).$*.sgml

I've actually removed those files from CVS (all the .XX.sgml files where in
CVS to keep the history, but I have decided to keep them out since they are
generated automatically), let's see if that works out..



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: