Re: Plan for DDP
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:37:18AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:12:05AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> [...]
> > > And it's not necessarily the _development_ CVS, stable documents which are
> > > updated from time to time (once a month? typo fixes? new translations?) are
> > > also published using the same mechanism.
> >
> > Mmm, probably we should consider the same sort of maintainance we have
> > for point releases in stable (and so branching cvs whenever needed).
> [...]
>
> No, AFAICT Javier calls these documents 'stable' by contrast with CVS
> versions because they are extracted from released Debian packages, but
> taken from unstable. So these documents are most certainly snapshots
> at a given date, no need for branching there.
> I do not understand why he mentions these documents, they are currently
> updated because they are not correlated to the DDP CVS.
>
In fact I remember two different urls for stable and development
documents. Anyway what I mean is branching for stable-related and
sid-related docs. Having a 2-years or more life cycle for stable,
we could surely consider point releases for ducs (to correct
typos and integrate incomplete documentations, translations).
Branching is the most correct way to deal with this management.
And doc updates are also considerable for stable-updates.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: