On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 07:21:30AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Immediate is alioth. (Practically done) Please DONT have two CVS enabled at the same time, if you want an alternative plan to restore the service please detail it and do _not_ do things on your own others might not agree with. I, for one, do _NOT_ want to have the manuals I commit to restored on Alioth at the moment. Since I first want to see the service at gluck restored, an update done on the website and will then consider moving to a place where updates are not yet done for. You wish to move each manual, fine, ask for permission to each and every document maintainer for that manual, as listed in the DDP pages. Just like Adam has done recently. As I said before, many (most?) of the document maintainers + translators might not read this list. You could also take the chance to ask them if they are going to update the document and are indeed interested in maintaining them, wether they are willing to make a move to Docbook-XML, wether they are ok with the Alioth move, etc. > gluck requires Debian admin to create directory debian-doc. No, gluck requires Debian admin moving a full directory, as is, to the previous location. It's really nothing more than an 'mv' command + verify that klecker cronjob is still active, which will have to wait until that system is up [1] (which it looks like it is now BTS) > alioth is usable although I need consensus on my choice of directory > name before I can diclare it is up. (Hmmm... I can move directory later > too. But I will check this list in few days for the responses) manuals/ is fine by me, but, again, it should be noted as part of the instructions given to authors that will need to change their CVS/ROOT and CVS/Entries file in their local CVS copies. Regards Javi [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-news/debian-news-2004/msg00005.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature