Re: DDP restoration plan proposal (medium-term move to Alioth)
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:17:38PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> writes:
>
> > IMHO, DDP is relatively static. I am thinking more like that I would
> > like take this opportunity to clean up DDP while restoring it.
> >
> > At least consistency of directory names can be gained.
> >
> > Also considering SGML --> XML move in the future, "manuals.sgml" may be
> > better called "manuals". These are simple change.
>
> I'm ok with all of this. This is for restoring on gluck so authors
> can immediately re-start with the updates?
Yes and no.
Immediate is alioth. (Practically done)
gluck requires Debian admin to create directory debian-doc.
Tar balls are there on gluck.
alioth is usable although I need consensus on my choice of directory
name before I can diclare it is up. (Hmmm... I can move directory later
too. But I will check this list in few days for the responses)
Osamu
Reply to: