Re: maint-guide et other lost children
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 05:36:33PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 04:41:57PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 12:47:51PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > > Comments about some questionable docs:
> > >
> > > maint-guide
> > Questionable? By whose definition?
> Just as defined in the ddp.alioth home page.
> So ask Osamu :)
> Seriuosly, he probably was asking if any of them should be considered
> obsolete or inactive.
This may have been a bad choice of words.
How can developer-reference and maint-guide be excluded?
Most of the listed needs to be retained.